top of page

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 PROVES Review Scores Do NOT Matter


A Surprising Turn of Events in the Gaming Industry

In a turn of events that leaves us both baffled and questioning the current state of the gaming industry, "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3" has rocketed to the No.1 spot in the UK boxed charts. This ascent to the top comes despite the game receiving a paltry 4/10 score from IGN, a leading authority in gaming reviews. One cannot help but wonder: how is such a discrepancy between critical reception and commercial success even possible?


An Ill-Received Game Triumphs

At the heart of this conundrum lies "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3," a game that, for all intents and purposes, appears to be a mediocre addition to the franchise. It's essentially a glorified DLC of "Modern Warfare 2," yet it's being marketed and sold at the price of a full AAA release. The audacity of this move is almost impressive, even by today's gaming standards. The game, developed by Sledgehammer Games, not only falls short in terms of innovation but also in quality, having been (rumored to be) rushed through its development cycle in half the usual time. This truncated production time not only impacted the game's quality but also put undue pressure on the staff, leading to periods of crunch that are all too common in the gaming industry.



The Disparity Between Critics and Consumers

How then, with such a low score from a respected critic and a troubling development background, did "Modern Warfare 3" manage to outsell other titles, including the innovative "Super Mario Bros Wonder"? The game's success, especially in terms of physical copies sold on PS5 over the Xbox Series X|S, indicates a disconnect between the critical assessment of games and the purchasing decisions of consumers. This disparity raises questions about the power of brand loyalty and the effectiveness of marketing strategies that seem to overshadow the actual quality of the product.


A Trend of Low Consequences

The success of "Modern Warfare 3" is not just about one game; it's indicative of a larger, more concerning trend in the gaming industry. It seems that big names and franchises can get away with delivering subpar products with little to no consequence. This phenomenon not only misleads consumers but also sets a dangerous precedent for the quality of future games. The industry appears to be at a crossroads where the line between success and quality is becoming increasingly blurred.


The case of "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3" is a stark reminder that, in today's gaming landscape, the correlation between a game's quality and its commercial success is not as straightforward as one would hope. It begs the question: what are the real driving forces behind a game's success, and at what point will the quality of the content begin to matter more than the brand behind it? For now, the gaming community is left pondering these questions, as they witness a game with arguably more flaws than features reigning atop the sales charts.

~Smash

Comments


bottom of page